Web Paint-by-Number Forum
Comments on Puzzle #13598: Damien Hirst's art
By bartek2241 (bartek2241)

peek at solution       solve puzzle
  quality:   difficulty:   solvability: line & color logic only  

Puzzle Description:

Damien Hirst, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, a shark in formaldehyde in a vitrine.

#1: Avgvstvs (Avgvstvs) on Apr 24, 2011 [SPOILER]

It's very interesting to works of art transformed this way.

I just think "The Physical Impossibility..." was made by Damien Hirst.

Thanks for it.
#2: Aldege Cholette (aldege) on Apr 24, 2011
Fabulous.
#3: Liz P (lizteach) on Apr 24, 2011
Nice.
#4: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Apr 24, 2011
i really dont care about all the psychoanalysis/art stuff but this was just a very cool image
#5: Byrdie (byrdie) on Apr 24, 2011 [SPOILER]
A really neat image and I enjoyed solving it and watching it develop.

On the other hand, if this is intended for the current WCP, it fails on three counts - the title is incorrect, I don't see a clear blue square, the size, as I understand it, is to be 40x40.

If this was intended for the WCP, please don't delete it. Change the title to a non WCP one and create a separate puzzle. Leave this one as it is - it's too nice.
#6: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Apr 24, 2011
actually he does have plenty of blue squares that qualify (i took the rule that qwerty listed as meaning "at least" 1 blue square of 2x2 or greater but maybe he did in fact mean just 1 blue square)
#7: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Apr 25, 2011
i don't see a "WCP" in the title
#8: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Apr 25, 2011 [SPOILER]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Physical_Impossibility_of_Death_in_the_Mind_of_Someone_Living

It seems that Saatchi commissioned the work, and Hirst created it.
#9: bartek2241 (bartek2241) on Apr 25, 2011
Sorry, my mistake.
#10: annalivia (annalivia) on Apr 25, 2011
very nice
#11: Byrdie (byrdie) on Apr 25, 2011
Sorry bugsboo, I don't agree and you knew I wouldn't! <smile> In my book, and I'm hoping the judges', two blue squares abutting one another become a rectangle. I read the rules to mean that the square had to stand out and, while I've seen some exceptions I had trouble with but were acceptable, in this case the I don't believe the squares are discernable.

In any case, the other circumstances that don't meet the rules make this puzzle ineligible and, for now, the question irrelevant.
#12: Teresa K (fasstar) on Jun 6, 2011
Interesting puzzle.

Interesting artist.

http://larrybuttrose.blogspot.com/2010/10/damien-hirst-huckster-genius-huckster.html
#13: Bananas (Bananas) on Jun 10, 2017
love it love it love it

Goto next topic

You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.