peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty:
solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Grizix (Grizix) on Jul 7, 2010 [HINT] [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#2: Juan Luis Arteaga PĂ©rez (garimur) on Jul 7, 2010
Good puzzle, and good match, but sorry, Kai, maybe next time.#3: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Jul 7, 2010
if you cover her hair she totally looks like the grinch!#4: Kai-Uwe Zickerick (conzick) on Jul 8, 2010
haha
Congrats, Juan. Well played!#5: Liz P (Lizteach) on Jul 8, 2010 [HINT] [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#6: Gator (Gator) on Jul 15, 2010 [HINT]
Not sure if all of this is required, but this is how I did it.#7: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Jul 15, 2010
After the initial line/color logic, I used edge logic on the 2 clue in column 26 to see that R15C26-R17C26 were dots.
I then used a form of edge logic in column 9 with the 2 clue. If you try to place the 2 clue at R16C9-R17C9, then these cells would have to be part of the 5 and 4 clues respectively. The 5 and 4 clues would both have to cross column 11 which would make it invalid. So R17C9 is a dot.
The same kind of logic can be applied with the 4 clue in column 10. If the 4 clue were to extend down to row 17, this will again cause a contradiction in column 11. So the 4 clue must be up at least one more cell, making R13C10 black.
The rest solves out normally.
Great puzzle!
Found to be logically solvable by Gator.#8: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Sep 4, 2017
Didn't even try. Too big.#9: Vaggelis Kamaris (evag7651) on May 18, 2022
logically solvable. hard.
Show: Spoilers
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.