Comments on Puzzle #8232: .... or you could seek!
By Tom O'Connell (sensei69)
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: 
difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Apr 1, 2010
Found to be logically solvable by Gator.#2: Gator (Gator) on Apr 1, 2010 [HINT]
I used edge logic on the 4 clue in row 1 to get this one to solve. Very fun to solve.#3: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Apr 1, 2010
thx Gator#4: Levi Ross (rhodyboy888) on Apr 1, 2010 [HINT]
I also used edge logic. Not sure if I had to, but I never pass up the opportunity to use it. How sick is that? Nice puzzles!#5: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Apr 1, 2010
i do not see what this is supposed to be.#6: Sydnee Sherman (syd) on Apr 2, 2010
Looks like an "h", an eye, a plus sign, and a "d" to spell "hide" (as in hide and seek).#7: Jota (jota) on Apr 14, 2010
I had to rely on Syd's explanation. Fun solve though.#8: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
Struggled through and managed without any edge logic. Fun to solve. Not sure what I'm looking at, but I'll take syd's response as probably correct.#9: Gator (Gator) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT] [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#10: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
C3R5 & C4R5 can't both be dotted without making a "3" in R2. So one of them is black. That dots C2R5, C13R5 and C15R5. Then progress normally. A little later I may have had to do something similar in the same area working top down rather than bottom up, but I don't remember exactly how that worked.#11: Gator (Gator) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
OK thanks. I would call that a contradiction. It is still a multi-line technique (do something in one row to see how it affects another row) and would be advanced. Thanks for taking a look at it again.#12: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
i didn't claim to have done it solely with line logic or even without advanced logic...just no edge logic ;)#13: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Feb 12, 2011
Unpublished by sensei69#14: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Feb 12, 2011
New version published by sensei69.#15: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Feb 12, 2011 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#16: Liz P (lizteach) on Feb 12, 2011 [HINT] [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#17: Susan Duncan (medic25733) on Feb 15, 2011
Cool rebus Tom#18: Gator (Gator) on Feb 21, 2011 [HINT]
I used edge logic on the 5 clue in row 2 for this version.#19: Ron Jacobson (shmily999) on Mar 1, 2011 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#20: Sarah Andrews (sarah) on Mar 10, 2011 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#21: Edith Clark (eclark) on Dec 24, 2011
Maybe the 2 dots are really a colon--leading to the . . . or you could seek. I had to have someone explain that it was hide. I used edge logic.#22: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on May 7, 2013
yes Sarah ...its tear drops...I haven't seen these comments until just now
Show: Spoilers
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.