Comments on Puzzle #8232: .... or you could seek!
By Tom O'Connell (sensei69)
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: 
difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description:
rebus
#1: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Apr 1, 2010
Found to be logically solvable by Gator.#2: Gator (Gator) on Apr 1, 2010 [HINT]
I used edge logic on the 4 clue in row 1 to get this one to solve. Very fun to solve.#3: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Apr 1, 2010
thx Gator#4: Levi Ross (rhodyboy888) on Apr 1, 2010 [HINT]
I also used edge logic. Not sure if I had to, but I never pass up the opportunity to use it. How sick is that? Nice puzzles!#5: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Apr 1, 2010
i do not see what this is supposed to be.#6: Sydnee Sherman (syd) on Apr 2, 2010
Looks like an "h", an eye, a plus sign, and a "d" to spell "hide" (as in hide and seek).#7: Jota (jota) on Apr 14, 2010
I had to rely on Syd's explanation. Fun solve though.#8: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
Struggled through and managed without any edge logic. Fun to solve. Not sure what I'm looking at, but I'll take syd's response as probably correct.#9: Gator (Gator) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT] [SPOILER]
David - how were you able to get past here without edge logic (or some other form of advanced logic)?#10: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
C3R5 & C4R5 can't both be dotted without making a "3" in R2. So one of them is black. That dots C2R5, C13R5 and C15R5. Then progress normally. A little later I may have had to do something similar in the same area working top down rather than bottom up, but I don't remember exactly how that worked.#11: Gator (Gator) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
OK thanks. I would call that a contradiction. It is still a multi-line technique (do something in one row to see how it affects another row) and would be advanced. Thanks for taking a look at it again.#12: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Aug 23, 2010 [HINT]
i didn't claim to have done it solely with line logic or even without advanced logic...just no edge logic ;)#13: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Feb 12, 2011
Unpublished by sensei69#14: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Feb 12, 2011
New version published by sensei69.#15: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Feb 12, 2011 [SPOILER]
And the eyeballs just keep getting creepier!#16: Liz P (lizteach) on Feb 12, 2011 [HINT] [SPOILER]
I guess I didn't solve the same version you all did. A little edge logic on the 6 in column 14.#17: Susan Duncan (medic25733) on Feb 15, 2011
And that is a really misshapen eyeball. :P But I got the rebus.
Cool rebus Tom#18: Gator (Gator) on Feb 21, 2011 [HINT]
I used edge logic on the 5 clue in row 2 for this version.#19: Ron Jacobson (shmily999) on Mar 1, 2011 [SPOILER]
What are the two dots for in the lower left hand corner?#20: Sarah Andrews (sarah) on Mar 10, 2011 [SPOILER]
maybe the eye is crying#21: Edith Clark (eclark) on Dec 24, 2011
Maybe the 2 dots are really a colon--leading to the . . . or you could seek. I had to have someone explain that it was hide. I used edge logic.#22: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on May 7, 2013
yes Sarah ...its tear drops...I haven't seen these comments until just now
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.
