Web Paint-by-Number Forum
Comments on Puzzle #7728: '89 College Winner
By Joe (infrapinklizzard)

peek at solution       solve puzzle
  quality:   difficulty:   solvability: line logic only  

Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers

#1: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Feb 4, 2010 [SPOILER]

Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#2: Jane Doe (telly) on Feb 4, 2010 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#3: Jota (jota) on Feb 5, 2010
Joe lately you have become my favorite! Also I'll admit to agreeing with Adam 100%
#4: sanane samanye (maceraseven) on Feb 5, 2010
god job. almost logically unsolvable
#5: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Feb 5, 2010
LOL, Jota
#6: Teresa K (fasstar) on Feb 10, 2010
What a fun puzzle! Sometimes pixel hunting can be a pain, but this was fun because of the way the image popped out. The challenge was just right. Great job.
#7: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Aug 10, 2010
very nice puzzle
#8: karl (keicher) on Jun 21, 2011
requires some guessing, and this image could have been a lot better. it was recognizable from about 10% into it, and but i was disappointed by the lack of detail.
#9: Gator (Gator) on Jun 22, 2011
karl - it is completely solvable by only line logic, it is just really hard to find all of the cells needed to proceed.
#10: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Jun 22, 2011
just ignore him gator
#11: Kristen Vognild (Kristen) on May 27, 2012
Very nice. It's funny that he has such a recognizable silhouette. I wish there was more detail in the face, but I know (unlike Karl) how difficult it is to get the subtleties of facial features just right.
#12: Deborah Eater (cricketswool) on Mar 12, 2018
I like what you did there (with the title)!

I think the level of detail is just right. Your eye fills the missing bits much more accurately than they could be placed on a grid of this size.
#13: Daniel Korn (talechaser) on May 6, 2021 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers

Show: Spoilers

Goto next topic

You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.