peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty:
solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Apr 25, 2011
A Goofy rabbit :D#2: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Apr 25, 2011
his eyes are the opposite of crossed (whatever that is called)#3: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Apr 25, 2011
no guessing
when you get stuck edge logic on the 5 in row 18 and then (trickier to see) on the 2 in column 19 lets you finish this out with line logic
That's called wall-eyed :)#4: Liz P (lizteach) on Apr 26, 2011 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#5: Gator (Gator) on Apr 26, 2011 [HINT]
I did the edge logic in row 18, but I'm not sure how you are using the 2 clue in column 19. What I did was tried to place the 2 clue in row 4 in R4C19-R4C20. This obviously makes row 1 invalid. So these two cells are dots.#6: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Apr 26, 2011
Found to be logically solvable by Gator.#7: Joel Lynn (Furface1) on Apr 26, 2011
I always thought it was "cock-eyed"#8: Susan Duncan (medic25733) on Apr 26, 2011
Very cute rabbit#9: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Apr 26, 2011
no joel that would be sensei#10: Joel Lynn (Furface1) on Apr 26, 2011
haha
I thought of that, bugaboo#11: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Apr 27, 2011
sorry you don't have one#12: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Apr 27, 2011
(smile)#13: Liz P (lizteach) on Apr 28, 2011 [HINT]
I'm such a geek that I went back and solved again. I used what I believe is "affirmation logic" (or is it two way?) on the 1 in C18 to confirm that there was no possible way the 1 placed in R3 could allow the 2 in C19 to exist without exploding into quarks that affected C20, so it had to be in R4. I see how Gator did his as well (it's a twist on the same thing, I think). And wasn't there smile logic to finish?#14: Gator (Gator) on Apr 29, 2011 [HINT]
I just solved it again. No smile was needed.
Show: Spoilers
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.