Comments on Puzzle #11763: ALL people....
By Tom O'Connell (sensei69)
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 4 quality: 
difficulty: 
solvability: line & color logic only
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 4 quality: difficulty: solvability: line & color logic only
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Bryan (Cyclone) on Jan 16, 2011
Halfway through - it seems to require guessing on first look.#2: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Jan 16, 2011
New version published by sensei69.#3: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Jan 16, 2011
sorry Bryan, i messed up#4: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Jan 16, 2011
hey... got the ? after i fixed it lol#5: Brian Bellis (mootpoint) on Jan 16, 2011 [HINT]
I had to make one guess then everything fell into place. Nice puzzle.#6: Bryan (Cyclone) on Jan 16, 2011
I still find it needs guessing. And I hate that, because it forces one to move ahead and potentially have to backtrack.#7: Gator (Gator) on Jan 16, 2011
Agreed. Still needs guessing...#8: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Jan 16, 2011
thought i had it with no guessing until the red dots started showing up :(#9: Jota (jota) on Jan 16, 2011
This is so sad ...#10: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Jan 16, 2011
I'm sorry Gator... i presume that row 20 is the problem#11: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Jan 16, 2011
i thought that c-8,12,20 had to be dots or row 18 won't work out.... i'll try again
don't be sad Jota
just solved version 2 with no guessing...not sure if what i did constituted too much look-ahead or not...but it didn't seem like it...no one place broke it free...got stuck several times and muscled through it.#12: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Jan 16, 2011
by the way, weird picture tom. nice challenge.
thx David... you statement made me happy#13: Joel Lynn (furface1) on Jan 16, 2011 [HINT] [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#14: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Jan 16, 2011
come on sensei you can do it#15: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Jan 17, 2011 [HINT]
glad i could be a sunny spot in your day tom.#16: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Jan 17, 2011
i had to use some uncommon logic that isn't really described in the site's advanced logic section it was sort of a free-floating edge logic with a hint of two-way. its the kind of thing where a long column of blacks cross rows with only multiples unaccounted for so that you know other blacks have to branch off one direction or the other. watch for places where there's no way to alternate the branching without violate one of the two adjacent columns. does that make sense?
yes David & thx again#17: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Jan 17, 2011
i can do what, bugaboo?
"it" apparently since i am not really sure what it is#18: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Jan 17, 2011
haha
are you really Bill Clinton?#19: Bryan (Cyclone) on Jan 17, 2011
He did not have sexual relations with that...thing...#20: Sarah Andrews (sarah) on Jan 17, 2011 [SPOILER]
...what? =P
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#21: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Jan 18, 2011
New version published by sensei69.#22: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Jan 18, 2011
New version published by sensei69.#23: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Jan 18, 2011
ok ok ...i fixed it, Gator#24: Ron Jacobson (shmily999) on Jan 19, 2011 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#25: Gator (Gator) on Jan 19, 2011
:)#26: Susan Duncan (medic25733) on Jan 20, 2011
Weird#27: Jane Doe (telly) on Jan 20, 2011 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#28: Amy Can (hannahkin) on Jan 21, 2011
LOL Jane! I was thinking exactly the same thing!#29: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Oct 31, 2011
reloaded my solution from a previous version and started tweaking it and found the newest solution...so really, i can't speak to solvability at all...but it appears to have appeased ;)
Show: Spoilers
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.