peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Oct 30, 2010 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#2: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Oct 30, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#3: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Oct 30, 2010
row 18 infrapinklizzard?#4: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Oct 30, 2010
better recheck your comments
haha
fun solve
Fixed. Not used to these tiny ones...#5: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Oct 31, 2010
was a toughie, Joe, but i got it :)#6: ant (agrest272) on Oct 31, 2010 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#7: Byrdie (byrdie) on Oct 31, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#8: Paul Zrimsek (pzrimsek) on Oct 31, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#9: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Oct 31, 2010
Martin, "logic" broadly references any particular method of reasoning. There are many specific definitions of "logic". It means different things to mathematicians, philosophers and computer scientists.#10: Byrdie (byrdie) on Oct 31, 2010
Here, the consensus has fallen to the definition that a given solution is logical if it can be arrived at by someone "working in pen". In other words, any looking ahead must fall within a reasonable amount, say one really tricky move or a few simple ones.
Edge logic really has no more looking ahead than basic line logic; it merely encompasses another line.
Line logic says "if I put the <clue> all the way to the left, it will take up <these spaces>. If I put it all the way to the right, it will take up <those spaces>. Any overlapping spaces are <color>."
Edge logic says, "if I put the <clue> all the way to the left, it will cross <these vertical clues>. These vertical clues will|won't cause a problem in row x."
You must either think I'm really stupid or really dense.#11: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Oct 31, 2010
Line logic is elemental.
Edge logic, as I understand it (or more reasonably, as I practice it), is more elimination than look ahead.
When elimination requires looking 3 or 4 columns or rows in advance *****TO ME***** it seems more to be trial and error, even if the net result is only 1 possible solution.
I accept that there is a consensus of those evidently smarter than I am that it's ok to have to look deeper. It may even be logical. It doesn't meet my definition of being logically solvable and when my opinion is asked, as when I'm offered the drop down, I will continue to mark it as such.
Being someone who does not appreciate being condescended to, I try not to do it to others. I was merely trying to explain (badly, it seems) the way I regard edge logic.#12: Teresa K (fasstar) on Nov 1, 2010
The way I see it is that the entirety of what we do here is trial and error, including line logic. We cannot place anything without saying, "if it goes here, then...".
If placing clues with line logic is a positive way to locate the black spaces, then elimination-types of logic are often ways to positively place white spaces. This can be an effective way to move forward.
The trial-and-error on line logic is trivial. The t&e on edge logic is quite easily kept in one's head. It's when the chain of "if-then"s gets too unwieldy to remember (without marking the puzzle) that it becomes "not logical" *for this site*.
Martin, I get what you are saying. I think I have above average solving skills and I really enjoy using edge logic. But the logic required for puzzles like this is really beyond my ability. There are a handful of solvers who have frontal lobe connections for working memory that is way WAY above average. Maybe THEY can do it in their head, but I can't, and so "for me" it comes down to guessing and eventually finding out if my guess was right.#13: Teresa K (fasstar) on Nov 1, 2010
Joe, thanks for a clear explanation of what "logical" means here at webpbn. I was trying to explain it to my friend, and was just getting her more confused I think. I'll show her your comment.
Well, after looking at your hints, Joe, I was able to solve it without guessing. But it really stretched my brain. That's my kind of exercise - mental yoga. :-)#14: ant (agrest272) on Nov 1, 2010 [SPOILER]
Your hint still says R18. Maybe it need to be fixed in two places?
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#15: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 1, 2010
Thanks, Teresa. It actually said r18 in many places (like every mention of r13), but when I fixed it the first time I missed that last one. Fixed again.#16: Paul Zrimsek (pzrimsek) on Nov 1, 2010 [HINT]
Thanks, ant. I'm glad you came back and tried again!
Paul, can you explain how you judged where to place that 1 in c4? I can't see it.
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#17: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 1, 2010
Ah, yes, very good!#18: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Nov 2, 2010
Found to be logically solvable by Gator.#19: Gator (Gator) on Nov 2, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#20: Jota (jota) on Nov 2, 2010
I Like it!#21: Kurt Kowalczyk (bahabro) on Aug 2, 2014
fun lil puzz, Joe! nice image too :)#22: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Aug 2, 2014
Thanks, guys
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.