Web Paint-by-Number Forum
Comments on Puzzle #6849: Genesis
By Kai-Uwe Zickerick (conzick)

peek at solution       solve puzzle
  quality:   difficulty:   solvability: moderate lookahead  

Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers

#1: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Oct 4, 2009

Found to be logically solvable by Gator.
#2: Gator (Gator) on Oct 4, 2009 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints
#3: Kai-Uwe Zickerick (conzick) on Oct 5, 2009
thanks, Gator. I deeply hoped, that it is logically solvable. took me some time to create it.
#4: Teresa K (fasstar) on Oct 5, 2009
Conzick, I enjoy your puzzles, and really wanted to solve this one, even if it meant having to scroll back and forth and back and forth all the time. But it was so big that the javascript kept freezing up on me in Firefox. When I switched to IE browser, it was so slow to respond that it was impossible to work on. I know lots of other puzzlers have had the same problem with really big color puzzles. (Jan knows about the problem with huge color puzzles, but that's the way it is with javascript.)

I did peek, and I have to say, this is one very clever puzzle. Perhaps if it were done in B/W and each clue in a quadrant, two on top and two on bottom, it would have been more workable. You really have clever ideas, so if you try something like this in a square-ish B/W format, more people might be able to enjoy your fantastic creativity.

#5: ant (agrest272) on Oct 5, 2009
cool puzzle
#6: Kai-Uwe Zickerick (conzick) on Oct 6, 2009
Thanks, Teresa! I have to admit that you're right. I tried to make a puzzle in an unusual format and don't realize the problems it will make. I have a big monitor, so it worked easier for me. In this format it was only solvable with the 5-color-version.
But I will improve in the future (hope so...)
#7: Martha Valdés (maval) on Jan 27, 2012
Nice challenging puzzle.
It's a good image. I recognized what it meant before reading the description.
I agree with Teresa's suggestion of placing the images in two rows, it would avoid scrolling and the image would be entirely seen on the screen.
#8: besmirched tea (Besmirched Tea) on Feb 16, 2021
oh, you poor folks from 2012 before widescreen was common format instead of square for monitors :)
#9: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Feb 16, 2021
While I don't understand the first third, I really like the rest. Even with a 15" screen, I still had to go back and forth a bit. I really appreciate the creativity this took.

Show: Hints | Spoilers | Both

Goto next topic

You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.