Comments on Puzzle #26792: sneaky sneaky
By lala lili lolo (langedrako)
peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: 
difficulty: 
solvability: moderate lookahead
peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Wombat (wombatilim) on Mar 25, 2023 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#2: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Mar 25, 2023
Found to have a unique solution by wombatilim.#3: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Mar 25, 2023
Found to be solvable with deep lookahead by wombatilim.#4: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 10, 2023
test#5: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 10, 2023 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#6: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 10, 2023 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#7: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 10, 2023
test % sign?#8: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 17, 2023 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#9: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Nov 17, 2023
Found to be solvable with moderate lookahead by infrapinklizzard.#10: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 17, 2023
The test posts above were because the site was throwing Internal Server Errors on the post above. Valerie says that the host has some filtering that is misidentifying some comments as hacking attempts.#11: Bill Eisenmann (Bullet) on Nov 18, 2023
The culpret in this case seems to have been the "head" part of "lookahead", combined with *something* ?!? after that. hence the umlaut over the e to make it hëad
That was fun, but a lot harder than it looked like it should be!
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.