Web Paint-by-Number Forum
Comments on Puzzle #10673: The Limits of Human Potential
By Ray Star (RazorStar)

peek at solution       solve puzzle
  quality:   difficulty:   solvability: line logic only  

Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers

#1: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Oct 12, 2010

quite quaint
#2: Minnie Fuerstnau (m.fuerstnau) on Oct 13, 2010
Fun font.
#3: Gator (Gator) on Oct 13, 2010 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#4: susan doe (sudoe) on Oct 13, 2010
Reminded me of my years in physics. Thanks.
#5: Teresa K (fasstar) on Oct 13, 2010 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#6: Susan Duncan (medic25733) on Oct 14, 2010
Cool
#7: Ron Jacobson (shmily999) on Oct 14, 2010
Yeah for Calcuseless! lol

Thanks for the memories.
#8: Kylie :) (misty) on Oct 16, 2010
haha bugaboo try saying that five times in a row :D
#9: bugaboo (bugaboo) on Oct 16, 2010
thats easy
but i think you mean to say try saying that FAST five times in a row which is hard
haha
#10: MrsThing (MrsThing) on Oct 16, 2010
Agree with all the above. Fun to see it again :o)
#11: Kylie :) (misty) on Oct 16, 2010
Touché, good sir.
Yes, yes, I meant fast :D
#12: R. Peter Nessen (Itsbetterleftsaid) on Apr 19, 2011
Very nice. I always like a good math puzzle!
#13: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Apr 19, 2011
Re: #12, I like your username. :-)
#14: John Macdonald (perlwolf) on Oct 8, 2019
I disagree with the title, though. I'd put the limit to human potential a lot higher than zero. (The limit is the maximum/minimum possible value, and clearly human potential is more than nothing. If this is intended to be the upper limit, then switch the zero and the infinity in the expression.) As a non-mathematical statement, "human potential has no upper limit" makes sense but that is not what this mathematical expression actually states.

Show: Spoilers

Goto next topic

You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.