peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: difficulty: solvability: some guessing?
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Feb 12, 2010
New version published by maceraseven.#2: sanane samanye (maceraseven) on Feb 12, 2010
it is completely solvable by logic alone if you see the symmetry#3: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Feb 12, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#4: sanane samanye (maceraseven) on Feb 13, 2010
what do you mean?#5: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Feb 13, 2010
Jan will tell you what I mean.#6: sanane samanye (maceraseven) on Feb 13, 2010
if you mean that solving a puzzle by using symmetry is not considered logical, then why is it in solving techniques?#7: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Feb 13, 2010
OK, since Jan is not here yet, I will try and explain what he usually says (but it won't do him justice, since he says it so much better).#8: Jane Doe (telly) on Feb 13, 2010
Symmetry can only (or SHOULD only) be applied when you know the puzzle has a unique solution. He has posted sample puzzles with clues that appear symmetrical, but the puzzle is not symmetrical.
He can explain more about this once he reads these comments, if he chooses.
good image#9: Bryan (Cyclone) on Feb 14, 2014
I found this doable without guessing, actually. I may have just gotten lucky with a square I inadvertently marked that shouldn't have been marked, and actually caught a couple of squares I then reversed and continued from without considering the previous markings, and solved with moderate lookahead. I did use some two-way logic and some edge logic. Symmetry was never assumed. Even in the eyes edge logic solves.
Would love to see an admin. check into this. In such a case, if an admin. checks and gets stuck, I can try to assist.
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.