Web Paint-by-Number Forum
Comments on Puzzle #7033: Dedication to Gator
By Kai-Uwe Zickerick (conzick)

peek at solution       solve puzzle
  version: 2    quality:   difficulty:   solvability: moderate lookahead  

Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers

#1: Gator (Gator) on Oct 29, 2009 [HINT]

Nice logic.

Here is one part that goes a little deeper. After doing all the edge logic you can and one instance of two way logic, it appears that you will be stuck (unless I'm missing more edge logic somewhere). In column 9, you should have 2 of the 5 cells filled in (plus the 3 clue already done). If you look at row 3, you will notice that if R3C9 is filled in, then R3C8 and R3C10 will have to be dots.

Now try to complete the 5 clue in column 9 by filling in rows 1-3. This causes R3C8 to be a dot. If you look at rows 1, you have to fill in R1C8 or R1C10. Likewise for row 2, you would have to fill in R2C8 or R2C10. Given that R3C8 will already be a dot, you cannot fill in R1C8 or R2C8 as this would make column 8 invalid. Likewise in column 10, you cannot fill in both R1C10 and R2C10.

So filling in R1C9 causes a contradiction for all resulting possibilities. So R1C9 is a dot.

Once you have this, the rest of the puzzle solves normally.

#2: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Oct 29, 2009
I got to about the same point, but could find nothing else. Your logical reasoning seems a bit of a stretch.
#3: Gator (Gator) on Oct 30, 2009 [HINT]
That's the reason I haven't marked this as solvable by logic yet. I think it may be more than what we usually allow to "keep in our head" to be considered logically solvable.

I'll visit this one later to make sure I didn't miss any edge logic too.
#4: Jan Wolter (jan) on Oct 30, 2009
I got stuck at the same place as Gator. I buy his logic, but that's definitely a couple more levels of look-ahead than we normally allow. I couldn't find anything else though.
#5: Mark Conger (aruba) on Oct 30, 2009
Looks like Ohio.
#6: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Nov 2, 2009
New version published by conzick.
#7: Kai-Uwe Zickerick (conzick) on Nov 2, 2009
This is solvable without guessing.
But you see in version 1 that guessing is not guessing every time. is ist possible to find a definition?
#8: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Nov 2, 2009
Found to be logically solvable by Gator.
#9: Gator (Gator) on Nov 2, 2009 [HINT]
This version is a little easier. I used edge logic. I also used two way logic with R3C16. Towards the end, I also tried to fill in R3C1 to find this would cause a contradiction in C3. Very nice training puzzle.
#10: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Nov 3, 2009
What is it that all of a sudden we are getting no-image puzzles. Part of the fun of solving the puzzle is finding the image.
#11: Kai-Uwe Zickerick (conzick) on Nov 4, 2009
improving your skills is important to solve puzzles with nice images.
#12: Jan Wolter (jan) on Nov 8, 2009 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#13: Logan J. Huorli (evillttlimp) on Mar 11, 2010 [HINT]
I'm sorry but I'm getting tired of these things.
#14: karl (keicher) on Apr 26, 2014
requires lots of guessing.
#15: Aurelian Ginkgo (AurelianGinkgo) on Nov 28, 2017
I find that since Kai set out to make a puzzle that improves edge logic skills, and not focus so much on the image, he achieved his objective. For that, I rate it a 3 in quality, as opposed to anything lower. However, in all fairness, since Kai purposefully left out part of what can make a puzzle enjoyable, I cannot rate it higher. It just looks like a scribble. That is not to say I did not enjoy solving this one. It's just that there is only joy in solving and nothing else. I suppose if there was some sort of discernable artist intent, I could look for that and appreciate it. But as a solver I appreciate that you accomplished your objective.
#16: Kristen Vognild (KRISTEN) on Nov 28, 2017 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#17: AM (adrian) on Feb 14, 2021
Solved using logic only, no guessing required.

Show: Spoilers

Goto next topic

You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.