peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty:
solvability: some guessing
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Mar 25, 2009 [HINT]
I was stuck early on, so I went to edge logic. As there were only 2's to use (other than for one 3 at the bottom) I used that 3 and eliminated one dot in the far right corner. The next time I placed the 3 one pixel over to the left, it solved the rest of the way. This is a cool-looking picture. Thanks.#2: Steve Johnson (swjohnson12) on Mar 29, 2009
I absolutely could not solve it even using Adam's hint (which was just as confusing to me). Sorry.#3: Jan Wolter (jan) on Apr 1, 2009 [HINT]
Adam uses the term "edge logic" much more broadly than I do. I think he means he tried the bottom row three at the far left. He found a contradiction from that, but he must have searched much further to do that than I normally would consider valid edge logic. Normally I'd just be checking it against one other row, but that doesn't give you anything in this case.#4: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Apr 1, 2009
Once that failed, Adam tried the "3" one space further to the left, and that lead to a solution.
That's a procedure I would call guessing.
This puzzle really looks like it would be solvable, if only you could get a start on it somehow. I haven't found a way to do that yet.
Found to require some guessing by jan.#5: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Apr 1, 2009
Thank you perfectly explaining what I did, Jan. Yes, I guess that technically is guessing, but in a puzzle like this, there was nothing else to do.
Show: Spoilers
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.