peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: difficulty:
solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description:
#1: m2 (mercymercy) on Dec 26, 2008
rotund#2: Byrdie (byrdie) on Dec 26, 2008
Yup, well fed.#3: Petra Lassen (stjarna) on Jan 5, 2009 [SPOILER]
Has it lost a leg?#4: Meg Smith (mamadragonfreak) on Mar 19, 2009 [HINT]
i found myself in a place where i had to make an educated guess to continue. i used the symetry as my guide.#5: Tamar Wilkinson (Tamar) on Jun 3, 2009 [HINT] [SPOILER]
I also had to use the symetry to complete it. Maybe the missing leg is to give it only one solution?#6: Eludwar (elfluvsdwarf) on Jul 16, 2009 [HINT]
had to guess symmetry.#7: Gator (Gator) on Aug 19, 2009 [HINT]
There are a few cells you can fill in or dot with smile, edge, and two-way logic, but it seems symmetry is the best way to go to get to a solution.#8: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Sep 8, 2009
Found to require some guessing by jan.#9: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Apr 2, 2010 [HINT] [SPOILER]
The only guess needed is to assume symmetry on the 5 in row 14.#10: Tony Jacobs (GTony) on Nov 26, 2010I've been wracking my brain to see if there's a way around it using xXxtreme logic. I've gotten several pixels in places that aren't obvious. A nice example is that c4r6 & c12r6 must be white because of crossing 2 clues.(C4&6 vs r7&8 and c10&12 vr7&8) Those 2s mean that there must be 2x2 squares of black, and those two pixels would be white no matter where the black squares overlap the already black pixels.
Also, [c4r10 to c6r11] and [c10r10 to c12r11] must also contain black squares. This is using a bit of information that we don't normally use: Normally we would not be able to tell whether these areas would have a 2x2 square or a "staircase" in them. However, the only staircase possible would be :
+-+-+-+ |X|X| | +-+-+-+ | |X|X| +-+-+-+OR+-+-+-+ | |X|X| +-+-+-+ |x|X| | +-+-+-+HOWEVER, since we know the puzzle has a unique solution, neither of those are possible as they are interchangeable clue-wise.
However, I'm stuck about 3/4 done. http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=TsTbetr
I did it without guessing. When I got stuck, I started narrowing down possibilities for the 5 in R14. I could rule out its going back as far as C4 or C5; ditto for C11 and C12. After that, it was fine.#11: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Feb 25, 2011
It looks someone already stepped on it!#12: Jan Wolter (jan) on May 6, 2011
(I fixed the formatting in Joe's comment #9)#13: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on May 12, 2011 [HINT]
i agree with gator...i used edge, one (each side) instance of two-way logic (with minimal look-ahead) and smile logic (primarily one up top and then once down low once you get enough other things filled in to narrow in on that 5 in R14). no symmetry logic was necessary (though would have made solving easier)...personally, i consider this one solvable without guessing.#14: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Jun 1, 2012
David - how did you go forward from my posted image?#15: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Jun 1, 2012
And the status has changed from "(requires some guessing)" to no warning. Maybe inadvertently when Jan edited my comment?
I guess it got through the first time, 504 - gateway error notwithstanding...#16: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on May 6, 2013 [HINT]
i don't remember my path from back then, but looking now...let's see, the best i can do:
whether C3R11 or C3R13 is black, the resulting dot(s) force C2R6 will be black.
lookahead alert: whether C1R11 or C1R13 is black, C2R13 is a dot.
IEL (?) blacks C4R13
same stuff other side?
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.