Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers

#1: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Nov 15, 2008

Been done at least 2 times before.

fun to do, though I've done this one before.

This is cool

I still want to tell you, Joseph...don't give away the joke with the title. lol

totally agree with #4

Technically, a witch cannot drown.

she melts?

No. I seem to remember learning how witches were tried during the witch hunts. The test was toss them into a lake. If they drowned, they were not a witch and proclaimed innocent (even though they died). If they floated, it was the witchcraft keeping them afloat and then they were killed.

sounds like a no-win situation

I remember that from Monty Python.

Which is not necessarily a completely reliable source of medieval history.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Trial by drowning is a medieval ordeal allegedly used on women suspected of witchcraft. The idea was that witches would float. As part of the trial the accused was thrown into a lake or river. If the accused sank, she was innocent and presumed not to be a witch. If the accused floated, she was presumed to be a witch and could be hanged or executed by burning. Either way, the accused faced death, and a no-win situation.
According to Frederick G. Kempin's Historical Introduction to Anglo-American Law in a Nutshell, a West legal text, the actual practice was to hurl the tied-up accused into a body of water. If the water received the accused, she was innocent and hopefully pulled out of the water and freed. Kempin notes that the historical record indicates a preponderance of acquittals. Also per Kempin, this was not a method of trial exclusive to charges of witchcraft, but was for villeins and other "unfree" people in medieval England. Kempin's description of the practice is congruent with a trial by ordeal of cold water.

It made me chuckle. :)

this puzzle is a no-win situation.

Show: Spoilers

Goto next topic

You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.