peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead?
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Michael Eddy (meddy) on Jun 28, 2022 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#2: Michael Eddy (meddy) on Jun 28, 2022
Finished it, but I don't feel satisfied. There's a point where deep lookahead just feels like trial and error to me, which isn't really different from guessing in my book. I wonder if anyone will be able to solve this through more conventional means.#3: Karen Scholl (karenttrouble) on Jun 29, 2022 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#4: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Jul 5, 2022 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#5: derby (Derby) on Jul 11, 2022
Enjoyed this puzzle#6: Courtenay Footman (Courtenay) on Aug 27, 2022 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#7: Emimonster (emimonster) on Dec 22, 2022
I've filled a lot with a lot of IEL and 2way, including some look ahead and further 2way on the 2way, and I feel stuck.#8: AM (adrian) on Sep 30, 2023
I've got C5 filled through R26, and I don't feel like I can IEL the 2 in C5.
I've done a bunch of 2 way on the 1s in R34.
Not being able to rule out C5R49 yet is holding me back.
Soleved using logic only. No guessing required.
I think using some deeper lookahead is no different from "conventional" logic, the latter being lookahead with fewer steps.
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.