peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description:
(This puzzle was recovered from the 2016 database crash. Description not available.)
#1: Brian Bellis (mootpoint) on Nov 14, 2018 [SPOILER] classify
Did you know there is a "correct" way to eat a cupcake?#2: Lollipop (lollipop) on Nov 14, 2019 [SPOILER] classify
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjM9tR42Szo
I have never in my long life seen anyone eat a cupcake that way, Brian. Have you? Plus it takes all the joy out of eating a cupcake.#3: Bill Eisenmann (Bullet) on Mar 9, 2021 classify
"...Description not available."#4: Andrew Schultz (blurglecruncheon) on Dec 3, 2022 [HINT] classify
DANG, I just cain't figger out wot it spose da be!
An interesting solve--I checked my logic & hope the lack of pictures doesn't hurt things. I also feel I could've found quicker reasoning.#5: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Dec 3, 2022 classify
Edge logic after placing the reds: R4C3 being black doesn't leave enough space in column 7. That puts black dots at R4C5/6 and then edge logic makes R10 C16/17. Then R4C4 is a dot, or again C7 doesn't have space for the 2s.
Now look at C13. If the 1/2 are in rows 3 and 5-6, then C17 doesn't have the room for 2 1's. So the 2 is in rows 6-8, so C13R7 is black.
This doesn't seem to be the fastest step, but if C17R3 is black, then we get contradictions in rows 15/16.
Now just the 5 rows to the left remain. I used edge logic on the 3 in C1--having R5 black means R6C1 is black, making nowhere to place a 2 in column 4.
Line logic completes things.
Found to be solvable with moderate lookahead by blurglecruncheon.
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.