peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on May 6, 2013 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#2: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on May 6, 2013 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#3: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on May 9, 2013
Yep, this one was very tricky. I ended up using a lot of visual logic (this square can't be red, because that would be outside of the triangle), but I trust you that there were logical steps to take. :)#4: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on May 9, 2013
Tricky can be good. I was ready to move on after the fifth solve, tho.#5: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on May 14, 2013
Interesting#6: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on May 30, 2013
Found to be solvable with moderate lookahead by infrapinklizzard.#7: Vaggelis Kamaris (evag7651) on Jul 19, 2013
solved!!! (with a couple of reverts)#8: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Jul 19, 2013
Congrats, Vaggelis. It's a tough one!#9: Linda Martin (ilovethispuzzle123) on Nov 25, 2013
very hard but beautiful. kind of sparkly when you view it from a distance.#10: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 26, 2013
Thanks, Linda. This is one of my hardest, and that's saying something.#11: portafolio12000 (portafolio12000) on Feb 19, 2014
DifÃcil, pero puede resolverse lógicamente con un par de suposiciones para asegurar la forme de contactar de las rojas arriba y de las azules abajo a la izquierda.#12: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Feb 19, 2014 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#13: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Oct 1, 2016
Too tedious for me at this time.#14: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Apr 27, 2018
I tried it again and find that it is still too tedious. Great amount of work seems to have gone into its design though.#15: Velma Warren (Shiro) on Jun 26, 2019
Not fun.#16: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Jun 27, 2019
It's super fun for the logic wonks. ;)#17: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Jun 27, 2019
Kristen, are you saying it's wonky?#18: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Jun 28, 2019
Now that you mention it. ;)#19: Bill (PopPop) on Mar 19, 2020
Excellent puzzle. I would have considered it "deep look ahead" There were several places where I I made an assumption, then disproved the opposite, and some of those required many steps before arriving at the disprove.#20: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Mar 19, 2020 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.