Comments on Puzzle #21096: I remember an advertising character who looked like this
By Tom King (sgusa)
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: 
difficulty: 
solvability: line logic only
peek at solution solve puzzle
version: 2 quality: difficulty: solvability: line logic only
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Norma Dee (norm0908) on Feb 13, 2013
I think it's karl! Looks just like him. Neat puzzle, Tom.#2: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Feb 13, 2013
:-) Norma.#3: Aldege Cholette (aldege) on Feb 13, 2013
I don't think it really looks like the "Go Daddy" logo (especially with the hair going out to the sides and lack of glasses), and I couldn't find any "Egghead" characters that even remotely resembled this. I am not sure to whom you must be referring, Tom. Sorry. Also, I think I had to guess on this puzzle. Any solving hint(s) would be appreciated.
Norma,I think this guy might be too handsome to be Karl,and besides this guy is wearing a smile,not a frown.lol. Neat image Tom.:)#4: Norma Dee (norm0908) on Feb 13, 2013
I think you're right, Al. Waaaay too handsome.#5: kenzi03 (kenzi03) on Feb 13, 2013 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#6: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Feb 13, 2013
New version published by sgusa.#7: Tom King (sgusa) on Feb 13, 2013
I was using smile logic on the mouth. I may have taken this too loosely, so edited it so you should no longer have a problem.#8: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Feb 14, 2013
wow. have had this one open since about the time it was posted and was fighting VERY hard to solve it...including tracking my advanced logic (some of which i was pretty proud of). finally came to the comments to see if anybody else had advanced much further and found out that there is a new version and all of my work is invalid. sad. very sad. really my fault to taking so long. i wish there were "in puzzle" notification that the version has changed...#9: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Feb 14, 2013
definitely easier this time around. thank you!#10: Mitch Nelson (holy_mn) on Feb 14, 2013 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#11: Tom King (sgusa) on Feb 16, 2013
David, I still don't quite understand smile logic reasoning. That 5 clue fit one way with the 1s above it in the original solution. I blocked off the ones, made them vertical twos and it solved out without the previous smile logic. I thought that the original version complied with smile logic. Please explain why I was wrong. I have pushed this logic a couple of times, and have had to revise. I run into puzzles with vertical smile logic, and have trouble figuring them out.#12: Tom King (sgusa) on Feb 16, 2013
Mitch, I think you are correct :)
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.