Web Paint-by-Number Forum
Comments on Puzzle #21815: try tri again
By Joe (infrapinklizzard)

peek at solution       solve puzzle
  quality:   difficulty:   solvability: moderate lookahead  

Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers

#1: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on May 6, 2013 [HINT]

Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints
#2: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on May 6, 2013 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#3: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on May 9, 2013
Yep, this one was very tricky. I ended up using a lot of visual logic (this square can't be red, because that would be outside of the triangle), but I trust you that there were logical steps to take. :)
#4: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on May 9, 2013
Tricky can be good. I was ready to move on after the fifth solve, tho.
#5: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on May 14, 2013
Interesting
#6: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on May 30, 2013
Found to be solvable with moderate lookahead by infrapinklizzard.
#7: Vaggelis Kamaris (evag7651) on Jul 19, 2013
solved!!! (with a couple of reverts)
#8: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Jul 19, 2013
Congrats, Vaggelis. It's a tough one!
#9: Linda Martin (ilovethispuzzle123) on Nov 25, 2013
very hard but beautiful. kind of sparkly when you view it from a distance.
#10: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Nov 26, 2013
Thanks, Linda. This is one of my hardest, and that's saying something.
#11: portafolio12000 (portafolio12000) on Feb 19, 2014
Difícil, pero puede resolverse lógicamente con un par de suposiciones para asegurar la forme de contactar de las rojas arriba y de las azules abajo a la izquierda.
#12: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Feb 19, 2014 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints
#13: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Oct 1, 2016
Too tedious for me at this time.
#14: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Apr 27, 2018
I tried it again and find that it is still too tedious. Great amount of work seems to have gone into its design though.
#15: Velma Warren (Shiro) on Jun 26, 2019
Not fun.
#16: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Jun 27, 2019
It's super fun for the logic wonks. ;)
#17: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Jun 27, 2019
Kristen, are you saying it's wonky?
#18: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Jun 28, 2019
Now that you mention it. ;)
#19: Bill (PopPop) on Mar 19, 2020
Excellent puzzle. I would have considered it "deep look ahead" There were several places where I I made an assumption, then disproved the opposite, and some of those required many steps before arriving at the disprove.
#20: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Mar 19, 2020 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints

Show: Hints | Spoilers | Both

Goto next topic

You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.