Comments on Puzzle #10397: Not Fungus
By Joe (infrapinklizzard)
peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: 
difficulty: 
solvability: moderate lookahead
peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Oct 2, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#2: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Oct 2, 2010 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#3: Adam Nielson (monkeyboy) on Oct 2, 2010 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#4: Brian Bellis (mootpoint) on Oct 2, 2010
This would have been a good entry in my Versus series.#5: ikke (ikke) on Oct 3, 2010
got stuck but the hint from Joe helped and than it was real easy. thanks Joe.#6: Tom O'Connell (sensei69) on Oct 3, 2010
i just thought it was fun to solve#7: Jota (jota) on Oct 3, 2010
Me too Tom.#8: Susan Duncan (medic25733) on Oct 4, 2010
Good solve Joe#9: Teresa K (fasstar) on Oct 4, 2010
That was a fun challenge. I was able to figure it out without looking at the hints. Yeah! :-)#10: Byrdie (byrdie) on Oct 10, 2010
I still struggle with the idea that two-way logic seems like trial and error. The fact that it's a 50/50 proposition rather than one greater than that doesn't lessen it for me. I'm not sure why it would be more acceptable than "pattern logic" - seeing that the solution follows a particular pattern and then solving according to that.#11: Web Paint-By-Number Robot (webpbn) on Oct 22, 2010
Not trying to start an argument, just expressing my thoughts.
Found to be logically solvable by Gator.#12: Gator (Gator) on Oct 22, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#13: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Dec 15, 2010 [HINT]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view hints#14: BlackCat (BlackCat) on Jan 29, 2018
I had no problem solving this. It was disappointing since I don't have a clue as to what it is.
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.