peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead?
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Joe (infrapinklizzard) on Mar 17, 2012
A bit simple. I haven't been very inspired lately.#2: Teresa K (fasstar) on Mar 17, 2012
Some hints at http://infrapinklizzard.deviantart.com/art/Logic-17700-290924919
Simple design but not simple to solve. Very fun! No guessing. I enjoyed the aha! moment. Clever title too. I hope you do more for us, Joe.#3: Trish217 (Trish217) on Mar 18, 2012
I guessed a little. Logic really isn't my forte. Enjoyed solving it!#4: Aldege Cholette (aldege) on Mar 18, 2012 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#5: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Mar 18, 2012 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#6: Jota (jota) on Mar 18, 2012
Nice solve! No guessing!#7: Vesta Vath (~Dessa46~) on Mar 18, 2012 [HINT]
I didn't have to guess. I just had to use step-logic. Nice puzzle!#8: Brian Bellis (mootpoint) on Mar 19, 2012
If it is a guess it sure as an obvious one.#9: Andrew Schultz (blurglecruncheon) on Jan 17, 2024 [HINT]
I found a different solution than Joe (I think) ... if the 2 in C1 touches any 2 in R5-10, the 4 in C2 can't reach R1, so R1 has 2 dots.
If the 2 is fully in R2-5, then again there's no space for the 4 in R1-3.
So the 2 in R9-10 is what is left.
4 in C@ must be R1-4. But that puts C4R5 and C4R7 as black dots, contradiction.
The 4 in C2 can't fin in R10-13 as then R2/3 are all dots.
The 4 can only fit in R3-6 or there is a contradiction in C3
Show: Spoilers
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.